1 reviews | Active since Member
I must add that in my opinion, I agree wholeheartedly with the other reviewer. Defamation for having a post removed, is only if it not true. In my opinion all the reviews, are indeed correct.
Shaz, in my opinion shows lack of empathy, she is demanding and downright rude. She demands huge amounts of money with no proof of work done. I am still waiting for her to make one appearance in court. There is always an excuse as to why she is not there. In my opinion, she obtains sick notes just to get out of it. From other reviews this is evident what she does does.
I am also yet to see an office premises or any other professional staff members.
What I would like to know why does the law society let an attorney of this calibre to continue trading and bring the rest of the profession into question.
Of course, this is only my opinion and therefore is not defamation