Attorneys engaging in fraudulent behaviour on behalf of their clients.

Jan Hildebrandt attorneys took over the management of our lease, which had already ended when they deemed that Rose Eedes had failed to do a satisfactory job of managing the property. They are refuse to return our deposit and instead provided a fraudulent invoice alleging damage done to the property. As it turns out this "invoice" was provided prior to our even moving into the property. Rose Eedes made absolutely no effort to secure a tenant. The main house stood empty from February 2019 until we moved out, with only 1 person coming to view the property during that time.

As previously stated the damage was pre-existing when we moved in, the repair invoice may reflect that work was done but the state of the property proves otherwise.

No incoming inspection was performed and the outgoing inspection was done without us being there, as such you have no baseline on which to measure what was our “alleged” damage in this scenario.

I have attached photos of what the property looked like when we moved in.

If you look at the outgoing inspection you will see that nearly every wall was marked as MOULDY, we reported this more times than I care to think about and it was never taken seriously. It reflects poorly on the owner and the agent, that they would allow people to live in these conditions.

I have yet to see quantifiable evidence that any of the alleged damage was caused by us and I have stated again and again what the issue with the backyard was and the lack of access to municipal bins due to incompetence on the side of Rose Eedes.

You merely reiterating what you deem to be “facts”, which I have disproven time and time again does not strengthen your case or make it valid.