Use AI Logo

Use AI

Claimed Business
27 Reviews (last 12 months)
Does not respond to reviews
Performance(last 12 months):
0.0Trustindex Rating
#7Ranked In Software & Apps
-100 NPSRecommended: Unlikely
Review Distribution
4.70|27 Reviews

May '25 - Apr '26

5(81.5%)
4(14.8%)
3(0%)
2(0%)
1(3.7%)

Recent reviews (27)

Used this business recently? Share your experience to help others decide.

Share Your Experience
MM
Marco Machado

1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020

5 Dec 2025, 12:38

beware the hidden subscription agreement when using www.use.ai

Used a site called www.use.ai to generate a birthday card. The site said I needed to pay to generate the picture, it was not much, around ZAR10.00. What I did not see in the agreement to pay was that the site signs you up for a monthly subscription, at almost ZAR600 a month, more than twice that for a standard ChatGPT subscription. You get NO reminders before the the charge runs either, and there is no way they will return the charge, as it "is clearly stated in their terms and conditions". I wonder how many people they get this way. I wonder how many people would notice the charge going off their bank statement amongst all the other charges either. All their customer support queries relate to cancelling subscriptions and why you won't get a refund so there you go. Avoid this site, there are better and more honest options out there.

0
Replies (0)
More
MI
Magenta I.

1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020

9 Sept 2025, 07:25

Happy Customer!

I was/am thoroughly impressed with Use AI. Easy to use, effective and so helpful. Trumps other AI services anyday. Fantastic support services. Will continue to use. Thank you!

0
Replies (0)
More
OB
Ona Banerjee

1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020

5 Sept 2025, 08:07

consistent context

Even after swapping between three models for a long document, nothing got lost. That kind of consistency is rare with AI tools.

0
Replies (0)
More
HD
Hemant D.

1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020

5 Sept 2025, 06:32

live model showdown

Ran the same code review through claude opus and gpt 4 in live comparison. The differences were obvious — and the better response wasn’t the one I expected.

0
Replies (0)
More
EB
Ebo B.

1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020

4 Sept 2025, 09:35

visual output test

I tried image analysis with one model, then prompt-based generation with another. The visual and multimodal support fits right into my workflow.

0
Replies (0)
More
SR
Simon R.

1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020

4 Sept 2025, 07:38

voice to text refine

I voice-dictated notes, then switched to gpt-4o to clean them up. Felt natural, almost like talking to an assistant.

0
Replies (0)
More
UK
Uza Kapoor

1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020

3 Sept 2025, 10:06

brainstorming with three

I threw a vague idea into gemini, then refined with claude, then polished with gpt-4. Each step stayed in the same conversation. It’s a more natural creative flow.

0
Replies (0)
More
IF
Isaac F.

1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020

3 Sept 2025, 09:07

dark mode missing

Love the unified interface and multi-LLM access, but wish there was a dark mode. Still kept using it for bilingual project notes — much faster than my old process.

0
Replies (0)
More