WW
WEBBER WENTZEL ATTORNEYS
Claimed Business
WW
WEBBER WENTZEL ATTORNEYS
Claimed Business
0 Reviews (last 12 months)
Does not respond to reviews
Performance(last 12 months):
TrustIndex
0
Ranking
#10
in Business & Legal Services
NPS Score
0
Recommended: Unlikely
Recent reviews (0)
Used this business recently? Share your experience to help others decide.
Used this business recently? Share your experience to help others decide.
Share Your ExperienceAS
Annette S
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
1 Apr 2025, 08:51
Webber Wentzel Transcription Service
I provided transcription services for Webber Wentzel through a transcription company acting as the client. The agreed payment terms for the invoice dated 6 February 2025 indicated processing during March, without a specified payment date. On 31 March 2025, I inquired with the transcription company regarding the status of the outstanding payment from Webber Wentzel. Subsequently, on the same day, Webber Wentzel communicated via email to the transcription company, stating: 'Kindly note we have funds have not been received for Eu**** and Ken**** matters, Payment will be processed when funds have been received. We will advise accordingly...'" The agreed payment terms for services rendered are 30 days from the invoice date. There have been previous instances of delayed payments from this company. The current late payment has resulted in budgetary constraints. While project submissions are consistently accompanied by specific and often urgent deadlines for completing transcription services, the timeliness of payments has not consistently aligned with these expectations. Regrettably, there was a discrepancy between the payment commitments made by Webber Wentzel to my client and the subsequent payment execution. Due to the recurring nature of delayed payments, I made the decision to conclude my professional relationship with my client, as consistent, timely payments are a fundamental aspect of my business operations.
Helpful (0)
|Replies (0)AS
Annette S
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
1 Apr 2025, 08:51
Webber Wentzel Transcription Service
I provided transcription services for Webber Wentzel through a transcription company acting as the client. The agreed payment terms for the invoice dated 6 February 2025 indicated processing during March, without a specified payment date. On 31 March 2025, I inquired with the transcription company regarding the status of the outstanding payment from Webber Wentzel. Subsequently, on the same day, Webber Wentzel communicated via email to the transcription company, stating: 'Kindly note we have funds have not been received for Eu**** and Ken**** matters, Payment will be processed when funds have been received. We will advise accordingly...'" The agreed payment terms for services rendered are 30 days from the invoice date. There have been previous instances of delayed payments from this company. The current late payment has resulted in budgetary constraints. While project submissions are consistently accompanied by specific and often urgent deadlines for completing transcription services, the timeliness of payments has not consistently aligned with these expectations. Regrettably, there was a discrepancy between the payment commitments made by Webber Wentzel to my client and the subsequent payment execution. Due to the recurring nature of delayed payments, I made the decision to conclude my professional relationship with my client, as consistent, timely payments are a fundamental aspect of my business operations.
0
Replies (0)D
Dzivhuluwani
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
4 Sept 2023, 14:32
Poor service
Poor service from mmwentzel, they dont update. When you call they dobt even answer they always promise to call you back, if there was 0 star would have given it
Helpful (0)
|Replies (0)D
Dzivhuluwani
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
4 Sept 2023, 14:32
Poor service
Poor service from mmwentzel, they dont update. When you call they dobt even answer they always promise to call you back, if there was 0 star would have given it
0
Replies (0)CP
Candice P
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
14 Mar 2022, 20:19
Misleading and abandoning clients
They took on an case of my partner who was seriously assaulted by the police infront of his house in 2012 and left him with a permanent damaged arm injury..Ten years later...still no response, no updates, no communication, no pay out, no NOTHING. Bad service delivery, fully incompetent and abandoning a client. Sies!
Helpful (0)
|Replies (0)CP
Candice P
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
14 Mar 2022, 20:19
Misleading and abandoning clients
They took on an case of my partner who was seriously assaulted by the police infront of his house in 2012 and left him with a permanent damaged arm injury..Ten years later...still no response, no updates, no communication, no pay out, no NOTHING. Bad service delivery, fully incompetent and abandoning a client. Sies!
0
Replies (0)A
MR
Mandy R
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
9 Nov 2020, 15:28
Crooked Attorney - Moray Hathorn (Webber Wentzel)
I was referred to Webber Wentzel Attorneys by a COVID-19 law firm who did pro-bono work during the lock down, Bowman's Law in Cape Town. My family and I were recommended to them as us being unemployed and due to the current state of our country (COVID-19 Level 4 Lock Down) where the owner wanted to evict due to an outstanding amount of R200 on our current month's rental. Attorney Moray Hathorn said it would be pro-bono, however 7 months later, today I received a bill from Moray Hathorn for R20 872.50. I have all the correspondence to confirm my story
Helpful (0)
|Replies (0)MR
Mandy R
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
9 Nov 2020, 15:28
Crooked Attorney - Moray Hathorn (Webber Wentzel)
I was referred to Webber Wentzel Attorneys by a COVID-19 law firm who did pro-bono work during the lock down, Bowman's Law in Cape Town. My family and I were recommended to them as us being unemployed and due to the current state of our country (COVID-19 Level 4 Lock Down) where the owner wanted to evict due to an outstanding amount of R200 on our current month's rental. Attorney Moray Hathorn said it would be pro-bono, however 7 months later, today I received a bill from Moray Hathorn for R20 872.50. I have all the correspondence to confirm my story
0
Replies (0)TS
Tidings S
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
14 Sept 2020, 07:53
Bad Service
Am very disappointed with Webber Wentzel I provided teansport service to them and they since haven't paid me since February I have tried to communicate with management but no one is helping me sometimes the manager ignores my messages am surprised for such a big company they don't want to pay for services rendered
Helpful (0)
|Replies (0)TS
Tidings S
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
14 Sept 2020, 07:53
Bad Service
Am very disappointed with Webber Wentzel I provided teansport service to them and they since haven't paid me since February I have tried to communicate with management but no one is helping me sometimes the manager ignores my messages am surprised for such a big company they don't want to pay for services rendered
0
Replies (0)TS
Timothy S
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
31 Aug 2020, 06:27
FIAT JUSTITIA
WEBBER WENTZEL IS INSTRUCTING ITS ATTORNEY MEMBERS TO REPRESENT CLIENTS IN UNDEMOCRATIC,UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND UNJUST COURTS AND THIS IS TO ***** CLIENTS BECAUSE THEY WILL NOT PROVIDE THE SERVICES THEY PROMISE CLIENTS AS OUR JUDICIAL SYSTEM IS ABOUT CRIME AND PUNISHMENT NOT BALANCING FACTS!CONSTITUTIONAL,DEMOCRATIC AND JUST JUDICIARY WILL BE ONE WHERE PRESIDING OFFICERS PRESIDE OVER CASES AND HAVE THE LAST WORD NOT PROSECUTION AND DEFENCE WHO ARE ALWAYS IN COLLUSION WITH PROSECUTION AGAINST THE DEFENDENT!
Helpful (0)
|Replies (0)TS
Timothy S
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
31 Aug 2020, 06:27
FIAT JUSTITIA
WEBBER WENTZEL IS INSTRUCTING ITS ATTORNEY MEMBERS TO REPRESENT CLIENTS IN UNDEMOCRATIC,UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND UNJUST COURTS AND THIS IS TO ***** CLIENTS BECAUSE THEY WILL NOT PROVIDE THE SERVICES THEY PROMISE CLIENTS AS OUR JUDICIAL SYSTEM IS ABOUT CRIME AND PUNISHMENT NOT BALANCING FACTS!CONSTITUTIONAL,DEMOCRATIC AND JUST JUDICIARY WILL BE ONE WHERE PRESIDING OFFICERS PRESIDE OVER CASES AND HAVE THE LAST WORD NOT PROSECUTION AND DEFENCE WHO ARE ALWAYS IN COLLUSION WITH PROSECUTION AGAINST THE DEFENDENT!
0
Replies (0)