1 reviews | Active since Member
Based on my Google Review and their response, it is clear that this company prefers to deflect and discredit rather than address concerns directly.
I want to clarify that my concerns are not based on hearsay, but on facts and documented evidence available to all owners.
Financial Records: The issue is not about whether payments were "approved," but that invoices and payments do not reconcile clearly when presented to owners. Transparency requires records that are both accurate and easy to understand for all members of the Body Corporate.
Voting Procedure: My understanding, based on relevant legislation and legal advice, is that quorum was met and the vote to remove the Managing Agent was passed in line with legal requirements. The communication that followed contradicted this. Their own acknowledgment of “difficulties in calculating votes” is deeply concerning, as this is a fundamental responsibility of any Managing Agent.
Influence of Others: My concerns are based on my direct experience as an owner and supported by evidence. Suggesting that they come from “vested interests” is inappropriate and dismissive. Owners are entitled to raise concerns independently, without having their motives questioned.
Until there is demonstrable transparency in financial reporting and consistent application of governance procedures, my concerns remain unresolved.