CC
Car Care Centurion
Unclaimed Business
CC
Performance(last 12 months):
#2Ranked In Other
-100 NPSUnlikely
Ranking
#2
in Other
NPS Score
-100
Recommended: Unlikely
Review Distribution
1|3 Reviews
Jun '25 - May '26
5(0%)
4(0%)
3(0%)
2(0%)
1(100%)
5(0%)
4(0%)
3(0%)
2(0%)
1(100%)
Recent reviews (3)
Used this business recently? Share your experience to help others decide.
Used this business recently? Share your experience to help others decide.
Share Your ExperienceC
Chris
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
9 Mar 2026, 06:42
I had a good first experience with Car Care Centurion, but things went downhill with my second vehicle
I had a good first experience with Car Care Centurion, but things went downhill with my second vehicle. Issues included: - Engine seized during test drive by them after service, attributed to oil pump failure - Engine rebuild had poor communication and updates - Vehicle was left outside, resulting in bodywork damage - Only partial compensation for damages - Post-rebuild issues: oil leak (partially fixed), sluggish performance, and possible rear main seal leak - Unresolved low oil warning Given this experience, I'm unlikely to return.
Helpful (0)
|Replies (0)C
Chris
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
9 Mar 2026, 06:42
I had a good first experience with Car Care Centurion, but things went downhill with my second vehicle
I had a good first experience with Car Care Centurion, but things went downhill with my second vehicle. Issues included: - Engine seized during test drive by them after service, attributed to oil pump failure - Engine rebuild had poor communication and updates - Vehicle was left outside, resulting in bodywork damage - Only partial compensation for damages - Post-rebuild issues: oil leak (partially fixed), sluggish performance, and possible rear main seal leak - Unresolved low oil warning Given this experience, I'm unlikely to return.
0
Replies (0)JK
Jason K
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
18 Oct 2025, 15:55
Serious Concerns About Workmanship and After-Service at Car Care Centurion
Date of Service: 24 July – 15 October 2025 Vehicle: Nissan NP200 1.5 dCi On 24 July 2025, my vehicle was towed to this workshop for a suspected oil pump failure. Despite the assessment being completed the same day, I only received a quotation on the fifth business day (29 July). On 9 August, I was informed that the vehicle was ready for collection. Upon starting it with a technician present, a distinct knocking noise was audible at idle. The technician claimed it was due to a “cold start,” but I explained that this was not normal. The workshop manager then stated it was diesel knock from injector #2 but confirmed they had not checked the bearings. I requested that they do so before releasing the vehicle. On 12 August, I was told the vehicle was repaired. The manager said the bearings were fine and the issue was with injector #2, which had been “tuned.” During the test drive, the vehicle was underpowered, which was traced to a disconnected turbo vacuum pipe. After this was corrected, the power returned, but the knocking noise persisted. The manager again dismissed bearing failure. Later that day, while driving home, the engine failed completely. The workshop towed the vehicle back and later confirmed that the big-end bearings had seized and the crankshaft was damaged. They accepted responsibility and replaced the crankshaft at their own cost. On 18 September, I collected the car and noted several new issues: Stiff steering (previously fine) Excessive smoke Missing/misfitted parts (battery bracket, engine cover bolt, positive terminal cover) Dented fender, which the workshop admitted occurred in their care Oil stains on the interior and load bin Used injector fitted but not coded to the ECU The owner appeared concerned and requested that I return the vehicle for correction, which I did on 2 October. Despite repeated follow-ups between 9 and 15 October, communication was inconsistent. The workshop later stated that while the steering was stiff, they could not identify the cause, and ultimately refused responsibility for both the steering and injector issues. The agreed fender repair also remained incomplete. Summary While the crankshaft was eventually replaced, the experience was marked by: Misdiagnosis leading to complete engine failure Delayed and poor communication Quality-control issues New faults introduced after repair Unresolved commitments My vehicle is now in a worse condition than when it was first delivered. I have detailed documentation of all correspondence, photographs, and repair records, and have notified the workshop that this report will be submitted to MIOSA, RMI, and the AA for review. Additionally, I have observed that several 5-star reviews on the company’s Google profile appear to be from individuals whose names match those listed as employees on the company’s own website.
Helpful (0)
|Replies (0)JK
Jason K
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
18 Oct 2025, 15:55
Serious Concerns About Workmanship and After-Service at Car Care Centurion
Date of Service: 24 July – 15 October 2025 Vehicle: Nissan NP200 1.5 dCi On 24 July 2025, my vehicle was towed to this workshop for a suspected oil pump failure. Despite the assessment being completed the same day, I only received a quotation on the fifth business day (29 July). On 9 August, I was informed that the vehicle was ready for collection. Upon starting it with a technician present, a distinct knocking noise was audible at idle. The technician claimed it was due to a “cold start,” but I explained that this was not normal. The workshop manager then stated it was diesel knock from injector #2 but confirmed they had not checked the bearings. I requested that they do so before releasing the vehicle. On 12 August, I was told the vehicle was repaired. The manager said the bearings were fine and the issue was with injector #2, which had been “tuned.” During the test drive, the vehicle was underpowered, which was traced to a disconnected turbo vacuum pipe. After this was corrected, the power returned, but the knocking noise persisted. The manager again dismissed bearing failure. Later that day, while driving home, the engine failed completely. The workshop towed the vehicle back and later confirmed that the big-end bearings had seized and the crankshaft was damaged. They accepted responsibility and replaced the crankshaft at their own cost. On 18 September, I collected the car and noted several new issues: Stiff steering (previously fine) Excessive smoke Missing/misfitted parts (battery bracket, engine cover bolt, positive terminal cover) Dented fender, which the workshop admitted occurred in their care Oil stains on the interior and load bin Used injector fitted but not coded to the ECU The owner appeared concerned and requested that I return the vehicle for correction, which I did on 2 October. Despite repeated follow-ups between 9 and 15 October, communication was inconsistent. The workshop later stated that while the steering was stiff, they could not identify the cause, and ultimately refused responsibility for both the steering and injector issues. The agreed fender repair also remained incomplete. Summary While the crankshaft was eventually replaced, the experience was marked by: Misdiagnosis leading to complete engine failure Delayed and poor communication Quality-control issues New faults introduced after repair Unresolved commitments My vehicle is now in a worse condition than when it was first delivered. I have detailed documentation of all correspondence, photographs, and repair records, and have notified the workshop that this report will be submitted to MIOSA, RMI, and the AA for review. Additionally, I have observed that several 5-star reviews on the company’s Google profile appear to be from individuals whose names match those listed as employees on the company’s own website.
0
Replies (0)NW
Nicola W
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
9 Jun 2025, 11:49
The admin staff are rude
The admin staff are rude. We were told that it would take an hour to get the parts. That was at 9am. By 1:30 pm the last part still hadn't arrived. The job was meant to be completed by 1pm. When I voiced my objection and said we still had to travel back to limpopo, the lady behind the desk rolled her eyes and sighed at me. When I told her not to do that she confronted me and got aggressive. I was then told to calm down! I wouldn't recommend them to anyone. Very bad attitudes towards customers!
Helpful (0)
|Replies (0)NW
Nicola W
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
9 Jun 2025, 11:49
The admin staff are rude
The admin staff are rude. We were told that it would take an hour to get the parts. That was at 9am. By 1:30 pm the last part still hadn't arrived. The job was meant to be completed by 1pm. When I voiced my objection and said we still had to travel back to limpopo, the lady behind the desk rolled her eyes and sighed at me. When I told her not to do that she confronted me and got aggressive. I was then told to calm down! I wouldn't recommend them to anyone. Very bad attitudes towards customers!
0
Replies (0)