LA
LR Adams
Unclaimed Business
Government & Ombudsman Services|0|0 Reviews (last 12 months)|This business does not respond to reviews
LA
LR Adams
Unclaimed Business
0 Reviews (last 12 months)
Does not respond to reviews
Performance(last 12 months):
Ranked In Government & Ombudsman Services
#5NPS Score
0Unlikely
Ranking
#5
in Government & Ombudsman Services
NPS Score
0
Recommended: Unlikely
Recent reviews (0)
Used this business recently? Share your experience to help others decide.
Used this business recently? Share your experience to help others decide.
Share Your ExperienceSM
Shani M
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
25 Oct 2023, 09:15
Excellent Service
Section 7(1) of Act 112 of 1998 states as follows: “Any witness who has reason to believe that his / her safety or the safety of any member of his / her extended family may be threatened by reason of being a witness, may apply for protection.” Non - Compliance Judge LR Adams Leicester Rock Adams Johannesburg High Court JCC ref 1157/2023 Appeal set aside a ruling, that was irregular, together with no alternate or remedial action. Judges errors and Attorneys representing dual Plaintiff. Interest rates and figures disputes with ABSA bank and Absa Guarantee Company. 2 separate plaintiffs. Absa Homeloans and Absa Guarantee company. Interest rate fixed on legal documents at 8.3 percent way below prime interest rate. Valuation incorrect. Processes not followed from attorneys. OFFLINE or Documents lodged "OFF THE RECORD" judge makes an order however fails, fails in delivering as claimed. Causing further costs and confusion, with no apology from the Judiciary or plaintiff attorney. Plaintiff A - Different Attorney and Advocate Plaintiff B - Different Attorney and Plaintiff Makes no sense. Defendant To pay costs. To Pay Bond. To pay rental somewhere else. To pay for relocation including animals. Defendant to pay for his own Eviction order. Does it make sense.
Helpful (0)
|Replies (0)SM
Shani M
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
25 Oct 2023, 09:15
Excellent Service
Section 7(1) of Act 112 of 1998 states as follows: “Any witness who has reason to believe that his / her safety or the safety of any member of his / her extended family may be threatened by reason of being a witness, may apply for protection.” Non - Compliance Judge LR Adams Leicester Rock Adams Johannesburg High Court JCC ref 1157/2023 Appeal set aside a ruling, that was irregular, together with no alternate or remedial action. Judges errors and Attorneys representing dual Plaintiff. Interest rates and figures disputes with ABSA bank and Absa Guarantee Company. 2 separate plaintiffs. Absa Homeloans and Absa Guarantee company. Interest rate fixed on legal documents at 8.3 percent way below prime interest rate. Valuation incorrect. Processes not followed from attorneys. OFFLINE or Documents lodged "OFF THE RECORD" judge makes an order however fails, fails in delivering as claimed. Causing further costs and confusion, with no apology from the Judiciary or plaintiff attorney. Plaintiff A - Different Attorney and Advocate Plaintiff B - Different Attorney and Plaintiff Makes no sense. Defendant To pay costs. To Pay Bond. To pay rental somewhere else. To pay for relocation including animals. Defendant to pay for his own Eviction order. Does it make sense.
0
Replies (0)