TrustIndex
0.0
Score
Ranking
#7
in Entertainment & Gaming
NPS Score
0
Recommended: Unlikely
Recent reviews (0)
Used this business recently? Share your experience to help others decide.
Used this business recently? Share your experience to help others decide.
Share Your Experience1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
Amarose Skin Tag Remover
its generally expected and dynamic trimmings enter significant into the skin and trigger your protected structure. It really dispenses with the skin defect when White platelets are at risk for the end as well as repairing of the affected skin. The influenced skin is troublesome and a skin scab can encourage on the spot. Click Here https://www.outlookindia.com/outlook-spotlight/amarose-reviews-best-mole-removal-exposed-amarose-skin-tag-remover-price-website-news-218792
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
Amarose Skin Tag Remover
its generally expected and dynamic trimmings enter significant into the skin and trigger your protected structure. It really dispenses with the skin defect when White platelets are at risk for the end as well as repairing of the affected skin. The influenced skin is troublesome and a skin scab can encourage on the spot. Click Here https://www.outlookindia.com/outlook-spotlight/amarose-reviews-best-mole-removal-exposed-amarose-skin-tag-remover-price-website-news-218792
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
https://www.mid-day.com/brand-media/article/silky-skin-tag-remover-reviews-beware-trust-mole-and-skin-tag-corrector-23274316
The serum additionally helps in the advancement of new skin cells, which works on the indications of maturing.Click here https://www.mid-day.com/brand-media/article/silky-skin-tag-remover-reviews-beware-trust-mole-and-skin-tag-corrector-23274316
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
https://www.mid-day.com/brand-media/article/silky-skin-tag-remover-reviews-beware-trust-mole-and-skin-tag-corrector-23274316
The serum additionally helps in the advancement of new skin cells, which works on the indications of maturing.Click here https://www.mid-day.com/brand-media/article/silky-skin-tag-remover-reviews-beware-trust-mole-and-skin-tag-corrector-23274316
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
Mobile Laser Tag
<p>Our company based in Johannesburg contacted the Owner of Mobile Laser Tag in Cape Town to purchase a set of Commercial Laser Tag Guns to be used in our business. He advertised on his website that he imports and services Laser Tag Equipment in JHB and CPT as well as hosts his own events in Cape Town and Johannesburg. He invited a representative of the company to a Laser Tag event in JHB and he pitched the product and explained the model of the business. He provided a formal Quotation (copy available). He requested full and upfront payment which the company duly did (copy of EFT proof of payment available). Delivery was scheduled for 30 days from date of payment and Invoice. After 30 days, the company did not receive delivery. The company tried to contact Mr Diedericks nearly every day for 3 months on his mobile and landline numbers but he avoided all calls and did not pick up. His phone would ring continously and numerous text messages and voicemails were left for his attention. The company also emailed him on many occassions enquiring as to the status of the delivery to which we received no response. The company then asked a business colleague in Cape Town to go to the listed address in Tableview Cape Town to enquire from Mr Diedericks Office. It was found that there was no business present at the address listed on the website/quotation. The company then did a bit of research and managed to get the number of his wife/partner, who said that she would enquire from him and get back to us, but she emphasised that it was not her problem. Needless to say she did not get back to us. We then decided to report the matter to the SAPS with a view to laying a charge of theft/fraud. We then emailed Mr Diedericks and sent him an SMS outlining the Company's intentions of laying a criminal charge of Fraud/Theft if he did not immediately deliver what we paid for or refund the money. He immediately called back and said that 'he forgot about us'. His explanantion was the Laser Tag system was sent through to SA and was in Customs hence the delay and that the System would be delivered wihin 2 weeks. We duly waited the 2 weeks and again after numerous calls and non delivery and us engaging the SAPS detectives who contacted his wife to locate him he calls the company back and says that the System had to be sent back as the language on the settings on the guns and controllers was in German ! He offered in writing in the interim to send us 'his personal set' as security/use till he obtained the product the company paid for as he did not want to be arrested. The company was instructed by its attorneys not to use the set but merely to hold it as security in the interim. Mr Diedericks gave a written undertaking to provide what was paid for. A further 4 months have passed by and still no delivery has materialised. During this period he gave the Company more of the same run around, ignored calls and emails etc. The company then decided to request a charge be laid with Specilised Commercial Crimes Unit in Cape Town and again duly informed Mr Diedericks of the charge and the implications thereof. Again true to form he quickly responded and said that unfortuately the Supplier of the System in Europe/USA has gone bust and therefore he will not be able to deliver. The compnay then asked him to refund its total deposit and retake possession of his set as per the agreement. He said that he could not do this and its tough luck for the company. The company asked him to provide official proof of payment of the initial order (bank statement, credit card transaction, Money transfer) to prove that he had indeed paid for the set. the company also asked for the customs documents showing delivery of the 'wrong system in german' to corroborate his statements. He refused to do so and said that he has 'the Purchase order in his possession' as proof. A purchase order and an invoice from his supplier, including proof of payment on his side and a customs clearance document is not the same thing. He clearly stated that he had paid for it and it was deliverde and that he sent it back. But he cannot provide proof of this.</p> <p>He then obtained the services of an Attorney after the copnay advised him that it was pusrsuing criminal charges of fraud immediately. His attorney then contacted the Company stating that the company was 'not allowed' to press charges of theft/fraud and it had to go through his officeas it was a 'civil' matter . The company did not buy his strategy and demanded its money. The Attorney then contacted the company (letter available) and proposed that the matter be settled 'amicably'. His client proposed that since the contract was for a new set worth R 26k and a n old set was sent through in the interim, his client was 'in law' only required to pay an amount of R 4k as a fulla nd final settlement to discharge him of his duties. The analogy the company gave the Attorney was that .. if you went to a car dealership an paid for a new car which you wanted and the dealership could not deliver.... but they took your money... and come back 8 months later and tell you to keep the old car they gave you and they'll give you a small amount in cash back and thats the end of the story.... </p> <p>The company will be pursuing criminal charges of Fraud against Mr Diedericks this week and will then proceed to obtain an order to sequestrate Mr Diedericks for the full amount due including damages and costs.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
Mobile Laser Tag
<p>Our company based in Johannesburg contacted the Owner of Mobile Laser Tag in Cape Town to purchase a set of Commercial Laser Tag Guns to be used in our business. He advertised on his website that he imports and services Laser Tag Equipment in JHB and CPT as well as hosts his own events in Cape Town and Johannesburg. He invited a representative of the company to a Laser Tag event in JHB and he pitched the product and explained the model of the business. He provided a formal Quotation (copy available). He requested full and upfront payment which the company duly did (copy of EFT proof of payment available). Delivery was scheduled for 30 days from date of payment and Invoice. After 30 days, the company did not receive delivery. The company tried to contact Mr Diedericks nearly every day for 3 months on his mobile and landline numbers but he avoided all calls and did not pick up. His phone would ring continously and numerous text messages and voicemails were left for his attention. The company also emailed him on many occassions enquiring as to the status of the delivery to which we received no response. The company then asked a business colleague in Cape Town to go to the listed address in Tableview Cape Town to enquire from Mr Diedericks Office. It was found that there was no business present at the address listed on the website/quotation. The company then did a bit of research and managed to get the number of his wife/partner, who said that she would enquire from him and get back to us, but she emphasised that it was not her problem. Needless to say she did not get back to us. We then decided to report the matter to the SAPS with a view to laying a charge of theft/fraud. We then emailed Mr Diedericks and sent him an SMS outlining the Company's intentions of laying a criminal charge of Fraud/Theft if he did not immediately deliver what we paid for or refund the money. He immediately called back and said that 'he forgot about us'. His explanantion was the Laser Tag system was sent through to SA and was in Customs hence the delay and that the System would be delivered wihin 2 weeks. We duly waited the 2 weeks and again after numerous calls and non delivery and us engaging the SAPS detectives who contacted his wife to locate him he calls the company back and says that the System had to be sent back as the language on the settings on the guns and controllers was in German ! He offered in writing in the interim to send us 'his personal set' as security/use till he obtained the product the company paid for as he did not want to be arrested. The company was instructed by its attorneys not to use the set but merely to hold it as security in the interim. Mr Diedericks gave a written undertaking to provide what was paid for. A further 4 months have passed by and still no delivery has materialised. During this period he gave the Company more of the same run around, ignored calls and emails etc. The company then decided to request a charge be laid with Specilised Commercial Crimes Unit in Cape Town and again duly informed Mr Diedericks of the charge and the implications thereof. Again true to form he quickly responded and said that unfortuately the Supplier of the System in Europe/USA has gone bust and therefore he will not be able to deliver. The compnay then asked him to refund its total deposit and retake possession of his set as per the agreement. He said that he could not do this and its tough luck for the company. The company asked him to provide official proof of payment of the initial order (bank statement, credit card transaction, Money transfer) to prove that he had indeed paid for the set. the company also asked for the customs documents showing delivery of the 'wrong system in german' to corroborate his statements. He refused to do so and said that he has 'the Purchase order in his possession' as proof. A purchase order and an invoice from his supplier, including proof of payment on his side and a customs clearance document is not the same thing. He clearly stated that he had paid for it and it was deliverde and that he sent it back. But he cannot provide proof of this.</p> <p>He then obtained the services of an Attorney after the copnay advised him that it was pusrsuing criminal charges of fraud immediately. His attorney then contacted the Company stating that the company was 'not allowed' to press charges of theft/fraud and it had to go through his officeas it was a 'civil' matter . The company did not buy his strategy and demanded its money. The Attorney then contacted the company (letter available) and proposed that the matter be settled 'amicably'. His client proposed that since the contract was for a new set worth R 26k and a n old set was sent through in the interim, his client was 'in law' only required to pay an amount of R 4k as a fulla nd final settlement to discharge him of his duties. The analogy the company gave the Attorney was that .. if you went to a car dealership an paid for a new car which you wanted and the dealership could not deliver.... but they took your money... and come back 8 months later and tell you to keep the old car they gave you and they'll give you a small amount in cash back and thats the end of the story.... </p> <p>The company will be pursuing criminal charges of Fraud against Mr Diedericks this week and will then proceed to obtain an order to sequestrate Mr Diedericks for the full amount due including damages and costs.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p>