Unprofessional P&P attoneys act e-legaly

I received a call from P&P attorneys from KZN representing Telkom most probable on an instruction i.e., a "account in arrears". The lady who phoned could not, and up to today never substantiate the claim with any documentation. In light of the high degree of ***** prevalent compels me to ask questions about the nature and history of this claim. The business was sold years ago and I strongly believe that the wrong client was contacted in this regard if any arears do exist. P&P attorneys the followed up on the call with SMS’s and their BULLY TACTICS to intimidate me with threats of court orders and attachment of goods etc. without any legal process or feedback or detail on the nature of this threat. If they are a debt collector then they have to follow the rules of the DEBT COLLECTORS COUNCILL’S CODE OF CONDUCT as stipulated by Adv Andries Cornelius the CEO of the debt collector’s council. If they are a LAW firm then they have to follow the rules of the KZN Law society as stipulated by the Society. P&P keep on sending threatening SMSs to my phone infringed my rights and it is certainly not in the public’s interest and I believe that they do not operate in the tacit approval of the KZN law society rules. This is mind boggling! Due to the high degree of ***** online and on SMS’s and WhatsApp call and messages it is my right to question absolute everything and to demand written documentation delivered to me in person not via threatening SMSs with bully tactics, ************ and threats. That is against my rights. P&P attorneys and their staff are not entitled to threaten me and therefore are in transgression of code of conduct. Today 16/08/2023 I phoned P&P attorneys and spoke to a a lady with the name of Meghan at the so called "debt collector" tel no 0600899611 "case no" 40M109065 and asked her if they were the originators of the SMS. She admitted yes, we are and immediately said they have no controlle over the system as it is system generated SMS’s. I just don’t believe that **** as what you put in a system is exactly what you will get out of it. If you put wording in it that is what you get out of it. I myself use systems to trace people and know how to follow the correct rules and regulations to that. I.e., if you put in a simple ref no then that is what you will generate on the outcome the system cannot think for itself. Meghan immediately lifts her tone of her voice and started to attack me verbally on which I asked her to lower her voice, to send me a mail attached the so-called statement and to stop threaten me on which she duped the call. I called her again and asked her why do you terminate the call and she said " duo to my voice tone." I said your wrong I demand that she lower her tone of her voice, not to interrupt me, not to shout at me and to stop threaten me immediately. I will not react to any threats at all nor will they threat me with BLACKLISTING of my ID. Any damage duo to their actions will be for their account end of story. Meghan must never ever phone me nor threaten me again, this "law" firm acting on behalf of TELKOM should be investigated. They appear on the network as TELKOM P&P attorneys and I would like to hear from TELKOM if that is in fact the case or not. They should be investigated by KZN law society, the debt collector’s society a, the consumer council and Telkom as well. How many people pay these people without proper support, information or representation.