GP
Gauteng Province Legislature
Unclaimed Business
GP
Gauteng Province Legislature
Unclaimed Business
0 Reviews (last 12 months)
Does not respond to reviews
Performance(last 12 months):
Ranked In Other
#2NPS Score
0Unlikely
Ranking
#2
in Other
NPS Score
0
Recommended: Unlikely
Recent reviews (0)
Used this business recently? Share your experience to help others decide.
Used this business recently? Share your experience to help others decide.
Share Your ExperienceSM
Shani M
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
26 Aug 2023, 11:01
Judge: Leister Rock Adams (Justice)
Judge: Leister Rock Adams Me LR Adams Opposing or non recommendation for promotion as prior to cutoff 1 September 2023 Cutoff Judge Leister Rock Adams - exploitation of powers. Applying "error of law" - Judicial misconduct Not applying Directives as outlined Applying " Off the record" orders Submitting orders to wrong people Causing more confusion Non fully computer literate Conflict of interest Impartial party No substantial knowledge on banking sector Assumed no.knowledge on fixed vs variable interest rates. Not applying all submitted facts. Minimal computer literary or practical experience - Not reading all facts Sin Die - Not fully understanding of (c) laws and Popia act * Submitting or forwarding personal. information with password-protecting documents. Failure to advertise or communicate hearing dates. Ex Parto Facto - Passing orders "OFF THE RECORD" Liaising (Privately) directly with Plaintiff attorneys and not communicating with the respondents. Not verifying information or knowledge, abuse of powers. Recommendation: Judicial inquiry to holding position off authority or powers of a Judge of the Judiciary of South Africa High Court. NB: A judge is considered to have served full service joint 12 years of service or retire at 70 (Whichever comes first) Further complaints to JCC and Law Society. JSC@judiciary.org.za
Helpful (0)
|Replies (0)SM
Shani M
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
26 Aug 2023, 11:01
Judge: Leister Rock Adams (Justice)
Judge: Leister Rock Adams Me LR Adams Opposing or non recommendation for promotion as prior to cutoff 1 September 2023 Cutoff Judge Leister Rock Adams - exploitation of powers. Applying "error of law" - Judicial misconduct Not applying Directives as outlined Applying " Off the record" orders Submitting orders to wrong people Causing more confusion Non fully computer literate Conflict of interest Impartial party No substantial knowledge on banking sector Assumed no.knowledge on fixed vs variable interest rates. Not applying all submitted facts. Minimal computer literary or practical experience - Not reading all facts Sin Die - Not fully understanding of (c) laws and Popia act * Submitting or forwarding personal. information with password-protecting documents. Failure to advertise or communicate hearing dates. Ex Parto Facto - Passing orders "OFF THE RECORD" Liaising (Privately) directly with Plaintiff attorneys and not communicating with the respondents. Not verifying information or knowledge, abuse of powers. Recommendation: Judicial inquiry to holding position off authority or powers of a Judge of the Judiciary of South Africa High Court. NB: A judge is considered to have served full service joint 12 years of service or retire at 70 (Whichever comes first) Further complaints to JCC and Law Society. JSC@judiciary.org.za
0
Replies (0)VK
Vincent K
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
8 Nov 2020, 17:05
Illegally occupied and erection of a house without any payment.
Lack of action regarding an Adopted Petition involving a stand that is illegally occupied. The department of Human settlement is reluctant to take action thus encouraging lawlessness and making the country a Bana Republic. The continued occupation and erection of a house without adhering to City's bylaws while others are currently paying for services.
Helpful (0)
|Replies (0)VK
Vincent K
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
8 Nov 2020, 17:05
Illegally occupied and erection of a house without any payment.
Lack of action regarding an Adopted Petition involving a stand that is illegally occupied. The department of Human settlement is reluctant to take action thus encouraging lawlessness and making the country a Bana Republic. The continued occupation and erection of a house without adhering to City's bylaws while others are currently paying for services.
0
Replies (0)jM
johanness M
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
19 Feb 2017, 21:16
corruption
<p>I am writing this complaint in regard to The STATE OF THE PROVINCE AADDRESS event tender that is taking place in Greenhills Stadium in Randfontein on the 20th of Feb 2017 . It was made clear by Gauteng Legislature Procurment during breifings that this event was exclusive to companies originating from the West rand but the Gauteng Legislature Procurment team decided appointment companies mainly coming from other areas other than those from the West rand.</p> <p>2. There was a compulsory tender briefing for this tender as a requirement but our investigation shows this requirement was violeted too.</p> <p>3. We are in possession of a tender document that ran parallel to the process we were still being subjected to with an adjusted terms of reference and relaxed terms before the current process was concluded. That means other competitors may have had unfair advantage.</p> <p>4. The evaluators assured us they would give the results of the outcome within a few days once the preferred bidders we appointed but up today we have not received such feedback and their preferred bidders started working from the 17th of Feb 2017.</p> <p> </p> <p>In view of the aforesaid we request a report regarding the outcome of the adjudication highlighting all scores by completing companies and the criteria used to determine the winning bidders in all the categories in which we participated like it was said during briefing sessions. We have evendence that can be made available to Hello Peter that this tender was judged unfairly, we have over 17 years experience in the events management field and we know as suppliers from the West Rand we know we have the capabilies because we have handled ****** events than this before. We request Hello Peter to assist us in invistigating why where we not the preffered bidders and why where we not informed of the preffered suppliers as promised. We wrote a foemal complaint to the Secretary General of Legislature Mr Peter Skosana and below was his response: </p> <p> </p> <p>Your email and letter dated 15th February 2017 refers.</p> <p> </p> <p>Subsequent to my earlier response to you, I have received a report from Gauteng Supply Chain Management (SCM) regarding your allegations of “irregularities in handling of procurement of SOPA services”. I have also spoken to other colleagues who were part of the panel to select service providers for SOPA to verify the content of the report. Based on the report and my analysis, I have arrived at the conclusion that there is no basis for your regarding irregularity in handling of procurement of SOPA services.</p> <p> </p> <p>Kind regards</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>Peter Skosana</p> <p>Secretary to the Legislature</p> <p>Gauteng Provincial Legislature</p> <p>Private Bag X52, Johannesburg, 2000<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Tel:+27 11 ********** Fax: +27 11 ********** Mobile: +27 ********** 20</p> <p>Email: ********** Web: www.gpl.gov.za</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>We look forward to your response and hope we can resolve this matter in good faith.</p>
Helpful (0)
|Replies (0)jM
johanness M
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
19 Feb 2017, 21:16
corruption
<p>I am writing this complaint in regard to The STATE OF THE PROVINCE AADDRESS event tender that is taking place in Greenhills Stadium in Randfontein on the 20th of Feb 2017 . It was made clear by Gauteng Legislature Procurment during breifings that this event was exclusive to companies originating from the West rand but the Gauteng Legislature Procurment team decided appointment companies mainly coming from other areas other than those from the West rand.</p> <p>2. There was a compulsory tender briefing for this tender as a requirement but our investigation shows this requirement was violeted too.</p> <p>3. We are in possession of a tender document that ran parallel to the process we were still being subjected to with an adjusted terms of reference and relaxed terms before the current process was concluded. That means other competitors may have had unfair advantage.</p> <p>4. The evaluators assured us they would give the results of the outcome within a few days once the preferred bidders we appointed but up today we have not received such feedback and their preferred bidders started working from the 17th of Feb 2017.</p> <p> </p> <p>In view of the aforesaid we request a report regarding the outcome of the adjudication highlighting all scores by completing companies and the criteria used to determine the winning bidders in all the categories in which we participated like it was said during briefing sessions. We have evendence that can be made available to Hello Peter that this tender was judged unfairly, we have over 17 years experience in the events management field and we know as suppliers from the West Rand we know we have the capabilies because we have handled ****** events than this before. We request Hello Peter to assist us in invistigating why where we not the preffered bidders and why where we not informed of the preffered suppliers as promised. We wrote a foemal complaint to the Secretary General of Legislature Mr Peter Skosana and below was his response: </p> <p> </p> <p>Your email and letter dated 15th February 2017 refers.</p> <p> </p> <p>Subsequent to my earlier response to you, I have received a report from Gauteng Supply Chain Management (SCM) regarding your allegations of “irregularities in handling of procurement of SOPA services”. I have also spoken to other colleagues who were part of the panel to select service providers for SOPA to verify the content of the report. Based on the report and my analysis, I have arrived at the conclusion that there is no basis for your regarding irregularity in handling of procurement of SOPA services.</p> <p> </p> <p>Kind regards</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>Peter Skosana</p> <p>Secretary to the Legislature</p> <p>Gauteng Provincial Legislature</p> <p>Private Bag X52, Johannesburg, 2000<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Tel:+27 11 ********** Fax: +27 11 ********** Mobile: +27 ********** 20</p> <p>Email: ********** Web: www.gpl.gov.za</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>We look forward to your response and hope we can resolve this matter in good faith.</p>
0
Replies (0)