GR
Grobler Rutsch Attorneys
Unclaimed Business
GR
Grobler Rutsch Attorneys
Unclaimed Business
3 Reviews (last 12 months)
Does not respond to reviews
Performance(last 12 months):
TrustIndex
0
Ranking
#10
in Business & Legal Services
NPS Score
-100
Recommended: Unlikely
Review Distribution
1|3 Reviews
Jun '25 - May '26
5(0%)
4(0%)
3(0%)
2(0%)
1(100%)
5(0%)
4(0%)
3(0%)
2(0%)
1(100%)
Frequently Asked Questions About Grobler Rutsch Attorneys
Grobler Rutsch Attorneys has a TrustIndex of 0 out of 10 on Hellopeter, based on 3 reviews in the last 12 months. Hellopeter has tracked Grobler Rutsch Attorneys across 4 total reviews. How is the TrustIndex calculated? →
Recent reviews (3)
Used this business recently? Share your experience to help others decide.
Used this business recently? Share your experience to help others decide.
Share Your ExperienceKN
Kim N
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
16 Feb 2026, 06:37
******** ITC Listing for Injury on Duty (COIDA) Medical Account
False Credit Default Listing – Injury on Duty (COIDA) Account Incorrectly Listed I am reporting an ******** ITC/default listing placed against my name for medical services arising from an Injury on Duty (IOD). The treatment was work-related and falls under the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act (COIDA). In terms of the Act, liability for medical costs rests with the Compensation Fund, not with the injured employee. I did not incur a personal debt, nor did I enter into any credit agreement. The hospital and surgeon submitted their claims directly to the Department of Labour, and the account was paid in full. I have provided documentary proof Despite this, an ITC/default listing was recorded against my name. Any allegation that the service provider was not informed of the IOD claim does not create personal liability and cannot lawfully justify a credit listing. I have formally disputed the listing and requested its removal. To date, the matter remains unresolved.
Helpful (0)
|Replies (0)KN
Kim N
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
16 Feb 2026, 06:37
******** ITC Listing for Injury on Duty (COIDA) Medical Account
False Credit Default Listing – Injury on Duty (COIDA) Account Incorrectly Listed I am reporting an ******** ITC/default listing placed against my name for medical services arising from an Injury on Duty (IOD). The treatment was work-related and falls under the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act (COIDA). In terms of the Act, liability for medical costs rests with the Compensation Fund, not with the injured employee. I did not incur a personal debt, nor did I enter into any credit agreement. The hospital and surgeon submitted their claims directly to the Department of Labour, and the account was paid in full. I have provided documentary proof Despite this, an ITC/default listing was recorded against my name. Any allegation that the service provider was not informed of the IOD claim does not create personal liability and cannot lawfully justify a credit listing. I have formally disputed the listing and requested its removal. To date, the matter remains unresolved.
0
Replies (0)SK
SEOPA K
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
21 Aug 2025, 13:04
Very unhappy with Grobler Rutsch attorneys
They collected R106 000 from me for a school debt and took me to court with the aim of attaching my properties. I requested that they account for the R106 000 so as to pay the balance. They do not want to entertain that.
Helpful (0)
|Replies (0)SK
SEOPA K
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
21 Aug 2025, 13:04
Very unhappy with Grobler Rutsch attorneys
They collected R106 000 from me for a school debt and took me to court with the aim of attaching my properties. I requested that they account for the R106 000 so as to pay the balance. They do not want to entertain that.
0
Replies (0)MS
Margie S
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
9 May 2025, 11:19
Steer clear of Grobler Rutsch Attorneys
Steer clear of Grobler Rutsch Attorneys for any legal work! Protection of my personal information is crucial under POPIA. I received a debt collection email from them meant for someone else. My email address was included twice. I have an unusual name that could not have been mixed up with the recipient's address. When I called their office line to ask why Grobler Rutsch had access to my personal information the employee was dismissive, argumentative, and rude. She said they must have got my personal information from the doctor's rooms the account was from. I don't know the doctor and have never been to her rooms, hospital, or even neighbourhood. Very *****. Stear clear!
Helpful (0)
|Replies (0)MS
Margie S
1 reviews | Active since Jan 2020
9 May 2025, 11:19
Steer clear of Grobler Rutsch Attorneys
Steer clear of Grobler Rutsch Attorneys for any legal work! Protection of my personal information is crucial under POPIA. I received a debt collection email from them meant for someone else. My email address was included twice. I have an unusual name that could not have been mixed up with the recipient's address. When I called their office line to ask why Grobler Rutsch had access to my personal information the employee was dismissive, argumentative, and rude. She said they must have got my personal information from the doctor's rooms the account was from. I don't know the doctor and have never been to her rooms, hospital, or even neighbourhood. Very *****. Stear clear!
0
Replies (0)TS