Failure to Enforce, Disputed Authority, Possible Abuse of Power, and Access to Governance Records

After extensive attempts to resolve matters directly with Unicity Realty, I remain without firm enforcement, clear timelines, or documentary proof for decisions affecting my property. A neighbouring tree continues to overhang into my yard and deposit debris, yet the responsible owner has merely been “advised” and no compliance date or enforcement step has been communicated. At the same time, I have been told that a tree inside my yard must be removed because the municipality allegedly requires it. However, no municipal notice, expert report, or written instruction has been produced to substantiate this claim. Further, photographs appear to have been taken from within my yard without my consent. I have asked for clarity on who entered and under what authority, but I have not received adequate answers. I have also requested access to trustee resolutions, minutes, contractor instructions, and the rules re**** upon. Transparency is essential in a community scheme, yet obtaining the governance trail has proven difficult. Given the ongoing uncer*****y, I am now preparing to escalate the matter formally to the Community Schemes Ombud Service. In addition, I am considering referral to the Property Practitioners Regulatory Authority regarding the conduct and administrative handling of the matter, and to the National Consumer Commission insofar as a paid management service may not be rendered with due care and skill. I remain willing to resolve the issue constructively, but without evidence, accountability, and proper enforcement, external intervention appears unavoidable.