RS
Reabetswe S
Active since Sep 2016
4
Reviews
0
Industries
Reviews
4 reviews13 months ago
Terrible experience
Overall a terrible experience. Firstly they gave an estimate of ten working days only for them to take more than twenty working days. Adding to that, the car was given to us with other things not fixed meaning we had to take it back several times for the issues to be checked out, leading to the car spending even more time at the workshop. There were parts missing, a mirror falling off, and wind coming into the car because of a missing panel piece even though they claimed the car went for an inspection. You'll be better off taking your car elsewhere.
0 replies
31 months ago
Messy, Unfair Policies
3rd year BCom Law Student. I wrote an exam paper for my Taxation module. After a few weeks I got my mark and decided to review my exam paper. NOW the BIG ISSUE is this - as I was reviewing my exam script, I was not allowed access to the question paper nor the memo. How can I review a paper without knowing the question nor the mark allocation? " it's policy " Secondly the mark on the student portal, the mark on the exam paper and the mark I calculated were different.
105 replies
31 months ago
Varsity College Marking
<p>I wrote a Law of Property Supplementary Examination. </p> <p>One of questions was what would constitute an unlawful clause in a mortgage bond.</p> <p>Amongst others, I wrote "Any clause that is against the Constitution of 1996"</p> <p> </p> <p>For this I was marked wrong. As far as Law is concerned, the Constitution is the Highest Law in the country, so anything against the Constitution is wrong. Apparently my answer was "too broad"</p> <p> </p> <p>Had I got that one mark, I would've passed my exam. </p> <p> </p> <p>Clearly they don't think the Constitution is the Supreme Law. Otherwise... well they would've marked it correct</p>
0 replies
31 months ago
Varsity College Marking Policy
<p>I wrote a Law of Property Supplementary Examination. </p> <p>One of questions was what would constute an unlawful clause in a mortgage bond.</p> <p>Amongst others, I wrote "Any clause that is against the Constitution of 1996"</p> <p> </p> <p>For this I was marked wrong. As far as Law is concerned, the Constitution is the Highest Law in the country, so anything against the Constitution is wrong. Apparently my answer was "too broad"</p> <p> </p> <p>Had I got that one mark, I would've passed my exam. </p> <p> </p> <p>Clearly they don't think the Constitution is the Supreme Law. Otherwise... well they would've marked it correct.</p>
106 replies
Review Distribution
5 Star
0 (0%)
4 Star
0 (0%)
3 Star
0 (0%)
2 Star
0 (0%)
1 Star
4 (100%)