MK
Menesh K
Active since Feb 2019
5
Reviews
0
Industries
Reviews
5 reviews11 months ago
************ *******
Your are absolutely ************ shady company. On 2 separate occasions I took my mum in to have X-rays done after she fell and broke her hip. On both those occasions I paid the bill immediately out of pocket. Only to find out that your company has resubmitted both those invoices to my mums medical aid and got paid by the medical aid as well. Now in order for me to claim this money back I have to complete paperwork and get my 82 year old mum to write letters to confirm I may act on her behalf. You created the *****ulent problem. You resolve it without any effort or intervention from my side. You *******. How many other innocent people have you done this to, to enrich yourselves?
116 replies
82 months ago
Swimming pool scam artist
So just to keep everyone in the loop on the progress of this matter. Today I’ve been back to Access pools premises after being to small claims court. Was advise by the clerk of the court to send a letter of demand for my money and all expenses incurred due to this fraudster. Went straight to Juan Diederiks of Access Pools and Handed over the letter of demand for him to refund my money. Furthermore, I had a chat with the owner of a company called Advance Pools a Mr Gerhard Vermeulen who says Juan Diederiks use to work for him until he fired him for stealing customers deposit money for swimming pools. Getting clients to deposit money into his personal account and selling pools from a competitor. Advance Pools are also in the process of legal action against Juan Diederiks from Access Pools for stealing Advance Pools designs. I’ve also been told that apparently there are other clients also in the process of legal action against Juan Diederiks for taking payment and not delivering. So, as you can see, this guy Juan Diederiks from Access Pools is nothing but a scam artist out to defraud people. Will be back with further updates to keep you posted.
0 replies
83 months ago
Swimming pool scam company
So here’s an update regarding this rogue....today I went to his business premises....unfortunately got there just after 5pm due to traffic...and this was after Juan Diedriks kept ignoring my calls and then eventually blocking my number...upon getting there I was told by his landlord that he had just left to fetch his wife Natasha....so I get the land lord to call him...he answers and says his in Rustenburg....a lie obviously....so his upset because I’ve mentioned him on Hello Peter and published his scam on Facebook....refuses to return my money and I says he will deliver when wants to. The matter has now gone to my attorneys.
0 replies
83 months ago
Failure to deliver
Access pools are the worst company to deal with when it comes to buying a fiberglass pool. At sale stage they put every other company down regarding their manufacturing process because Juan worked for all of them so he knows. Insisted that full payment must be made upfront. Payment made same day with immediate clearance. This was done on a Tuesday....promised delivery over the coming weekend....weekend came and went....promised delivery Monday afternoon....Monday came and went....Monday said he can’t give a date as to when he can deliver...... People be careful.....this guy Juan will say and do and promise you the world to secure the deal...once you’ve paid he does not have any customer service....you have to wait and don’t have a choice. He also refuse to refund my money. This matter will be handed over to my attorneys....I will be buying a new pool tomorrow from another company.
0 replies
88 months ago
Unethical corporate thieves
last month I had a Budget Insurance client involved in an accident with myself. Naturally to avoid my loss ratio being affected with my insurance company i decided to submit my claim directly to Budget Insurance 3rd party division. Their client was kind enough to provide me with his insurance details as he knew he was at fault. This is where it gets interesting: 1. case opened at the police station with both myself and the Budget client present. 2. police report outlined exactly what happened and signed by their client. 3. client was clearly at fault and he acknowledge it as well and signed the police report. Budget has come back and said i am 30% responsible for the accident because i did not swerve or hoot to avoid the accident citing some court case trying to intimidate me or thinking i might accept what they say as the gospel. This is the funny part...they have all the pictures that was taken at the scene of the accident as well as pictures of the damage to my car and their clients car which shows exactly where their client hit me. i was ahead of their client on the same dual lane road travelling in the same direction when their client swerved into my lane resulting in him side swiping my car on the right hand side from my driver door going towards the rear. Please explain to me how me hooting or swerving would have avoided this accident when it took less than a split second for him to make a decision to change lanes while next to me though behind me. (Budget Insurance taking a quick chance if you ask me) Now for the cherry on top: i went out and got quotes from 2 independent panel beaters. 1 being BMW themselves and 1 from another reputable panel beater. BMW quote is at R 97000 (approved BMW repair center) Panel beater is at R 89000 (not approved BMW repair center) Pretty much the same and unbiased as i have no affiliation with either. Both these quotes have been submitted. however i was told to take my car to their assessment center called Easyway. Which i have done. Quote from their non approved BMW panel beater via Easyway assessment center is at R 16000. The strange part is the panel beater never viewed the car at all. (they may have viewed pictures that the assessor may have provided, i don't know. Their quote is an entire world apart from the other 2 quotes i received. when i questioned this with their 3rd party consultant i was told that they only work on their assessment and only willing to settle their quote amount less the 30% that i am liable for because i didn't hoot and swerve to avoid an accident i didn't see coming. Upon my own investigation i found out that Easyway assessment center is a company that falls under the Telesure Group just like Budget Insurance does. Please explain how is this an independent assessment? Easyway do mention on their website and i quote "As a company, easyway values all its team members and stakeholders". Clearly evident as to whose interest they look out for....!!!!!!! I checked on the IMA (Institute of motor assessors SA) website and neither Easyway or the assessor that assessed the car is registered with them and again the question of how independent the assessment is and whose interest are they in favour of. Now my question is to everyone out there both clients of Budget and any 3rd party is, HOW IGNORANT DO YOU THINK THE LAYMAN OUT THERE IS ? It is blatantly obvious how SKEWED and BIAS the assessment is. Obviously they only concerned about their bottom line and the cheapest way out. Hence the name BUDGET INSURANCE, everything on a budget including the repairs to your car..!!!!!! The rule of thumb for any insurer is to indemnify the claimant to place them in the same position as they were prior to the incident. With the short-cut version of how they want to repair and not replace parts even if its second hand parts on my car please explain to me how will i be placed in the same position as i was prior to my incident brought on by your client. I look forward to litigation as i refuse to be fooled or bullied by any corporate, even if i have to do it via my own insurance company and let them fight the case in court.
210 replies
Review Distribution
5 Star
0 (0%)
4 Star
0 (0%)
3 Star
0 (0%)
2 Star
0 (0%)
1 Star
5 (100%)