LL
Lorato L
Active since Jun 2021
3
Reviews
0
Industries
Reviews
3 reviews46 months ago
Virgin active blatantly dismissive towards members concerns with no remorse
Virgin active blatantly dismissive towards members concerns with no remorse Over the past few weeks I have had the misfortune of liaising with senior members of Virgin Active South Africa who have displayed a nonchalant attitude and response to their members concerns . An incident took place on 8 June 2022 at virgin active vodaworld where a personal trainer felt unwell and walked out the class mid session . Prior to leaving he addressed a few members who were continually disrupting the class . The summary is that the said members complained about the trainer, resulting in his termination from VA classes . The majority of the members formed a group to sign a petition requesting VA to reinstate the trainer based on the majorities version disputing what was reported to VA . After engaging with Hashem Noormahomed, Zandile Marutha & Monique Barron, I realised that Virgin Active does not listen to reason even when they are in the wrong or have made an uninformed decision. Their actions have impacted no less than 100 members, with blatant disregard to meet with members representatives and reach an amicable solution for all parties affected . Despite having petitions signed as well as individual requests drafted for the gyms attention , our requests are deemed , in my opinion , unimportant to Virgin Active . An organisation that is built and run on members contributions should entertain their members concerns , especially when the complainants are from a vast majority. I urge corporates and medical schemes to investigate Virgin Active thoroughly prior to collaborating on any benefit schemes with them , as you may leave your employees fighting a system which refuses to engage in discussions with members ,, yet routinely bills their members and makes regular contact when their payments are late. In an age where the consumer of spoilt for choice , the onus is on the service provider to explore all options to achieve customer satisfaction .
0 replies
47 months ago
Bad customer service - Parts
On the Saturday 7th of May, I ordered a part from Fury Haval Woodmead. A Right Fog Light Cover for a H2. I was assisted by Aubrey. He said he's system is down and he will call me when it's back up. The day ended and he didn't call me back. Monday the 9th, Tuesday the 10th went and he didn't call me back. Wednesday the 11th,I call him to follow up and he still had not checked if the part is in stock. Once again he says that he will call me back. Today's is the 24th,he never called me back. Such terrible customer service 😢. I needed the part as my car was being repaired.
134 replies
59 months ago
TELKOM'S ROTTEN CUSTOMER SERVICE!
I wanted lodge a formal complaint with Telkom first for poor customer service. But to put a cherry on top of their rotten service, they say I cannot lodge a complaint. My debit order date is the 5th of every month. On the 5th of April Telkom did not debit my account. There was sufficient funds in the account. Therefore, it was not a bounce. And if it was a bounce, the bank would have notified me of the bounce and would have charged me. I called the contact centre and I was informed that Telkom did not collect the money due to a system error. During that time, I did not receive any notification from Telkom or any type of communication indicating that the account was in arrears. I had service for the duration of April but in May I realised that I had no internet connection. I thought there was something wrong with either the router or sim card because I was unaware that the money was not collect. On the 25th of May, I inserted the sim card in my phone and it is only then that I learned my line has been suspended. And when I called, I learned that indeed it was suspended due to non-payment. As a result of Telkom having failed to collect the money. I am unhappy because: 1. Telkom did not inform me that the account was in arrears. There was no communication non whatsoever. They usually send an SMS with the banking details if the account is in arrears a week or two later but there was no such this time around. 2. I am required to pay a lump sum of R1,932 including the June debit order. I do not have a lump sum. 3. I am willing to make a payment arrangement provided the line is reinstated since it was a non-performance issue on their side. Telkom did not do its part as service provider. I don’t understand why the line should remain suspended when I am willing to make a payment arrangement. This would mean I am not getting a service at all yet, I should pay for data that I am not using. If I am going to lose all of May's data which I have not used, then why should I pay for May? 4. Furthermore, if the line remains suspended until I pay off these arrears, will I accumulate the data that I have not used for the months in question because if the data will not accumulate, it does not make sense to pay for a service that was suspended and for data that I have not used and will never use. If Telkom insists that I pay the lump sum arrears first before reinstating the account, then I would like to cancel this subscription. Immediately. I will pay the cancellation fee of R807. So that no further amounts accrue and then I can make an arrangement to settle the arrears. I hope Telkom will have the decency to respond to this because, really, their customer care service is rotten. Their contact centre agents are programmed like robots. All they say is "pay the outstanding. Then you line will be reactivated"
0 replies
Review Distribution
5 Star
0 (0%)
4 Star
0 (0%)
3 Star
0 (0%)
2 Star
0 (0%)
1 Star
3 (100%)