Cindy L's Profile | Hellopeter

Share Your Experience

Industries I'm a Business

CL

Cindy L

Active since Aug 2025

3

Reviews

0

Industries

Reviews

3 reviews

Kenwood Home Appliances

4 months ago

Defective Kenwood Chef XL – Repeated Failures, No Reports, CPA Violation

I am lodging a formal complaint regarding a defective Kenwood Chef XL mixer purchased in December 2023 via Takealot. This appliance has now been returned twice for repairs: April 2025 – Ref: MRRN-Z804E-VJBQ June 2025 – Ref: MRRN-VBWWM-YXX9 Despite these repair attempts: No diagnostic or repair reports were ever provided, despite multiple requests The machine only functioned temporarily after each return The exact same fault has recurred yet again Most recently, the mixer stopped mid-use and is now completely unusable. This is unacceptable for a product of this nature and price. This matter clearly constitutes a latent defect, as the underlying fault persists despite repeated repair attempts, confirming that the product was not of acceptable quality at the time of supply. Furthermore, this is a direct violation of the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), which guarantees consumers the right to goods that are durable, of good quality, and free of defects. The failure to provide repair reports also reflects a serious lack of transparency and accountability. I have now issued a formal Letter of Demand to both Takealot and Kenwood, requiring: Full written diagnostic and repair reports for both repair instances A final resolution in the form of a full refund or replacement To date, I have received nothing more than an automated acknowledgement from Takealot — no report, no feedback, and no resolution. Should this matter not be resolved within the stipulated timeframe, I will proceed with escalation to the National Consumer Commission, and pursue further legal remedies available to me without further notice. This level of service and product failure is completely unacceptable. All supporting documentation, including return references and correspondence, is available on request.

0 replies

4 months ago

Defective Kenwood Chef XL – Repeated Failures, No Reports, CPA Violation

I am lodging a formal complaint regarding a defective Kenwood Chef XL mixer purchased in December 2023 via Takealot. This appliance has now been returned twice for repairs: April 2025 – Ref: MRRN-Z804E-VJBQ June 2025 – Ref: MRRN-VBWWM-YXX9 Despite these repair attempts: No diagnostic or repair reports were ever provided, despite multiple requests The machine only functioned temporarily after each return The exact same fault has recurred yet again Most recently, the mixer stopped mid-use and is now completely unusable. This is unacceptable for a product of this nature and price. This matter clearly constitutes a latent defect, as the underlying fault persists despite repeated repair attempts, confirming that the product was not of acceptable quality at the time of supply. Furthermore, this is a direct violation of the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), which guarantees consumers the right to goods that are durable, of good quality, and free of defects. The failure to provide repair reports also reflects a serious lack of transparency and accountability. I have now issued a formal Letter of Demand to both Takealot and Kenwood, requiring: Full written diagnostic and repair reports for both repair instances A final resolution in the form of a full refund or replacement To date, I have received nothing more than an automated acknowledgement from Takealot — no report, no feedback, and no resolution. Should this matter not be resolved within the stipulated timeframe, I will proceed with escalation to the National Consumer Commission, and pursue further legal remedies available to me without further notice. This level of service and product failure is completely unacceptable. All supporting documentation, including return references and correspondence, is available on request.

0 replies

12 months ago

PATHETIC REQUIREMENTS FROM CAPITEC

My husband is in hospital after losing his leg. His sick leave is finished, so we need to start UIF. He can sign all his documents — the only thing we need is Capitec to stamp his UI-2.8 form. I’ve phoned Customer Care twice, been to the branch three times, and given exactly what they asked for: a doctor’s letter and my husband’s signed permission. Still refused. They now demand a letter of authority or curatorship — even though my husband is alive, mentally capable, and SAPS came to his hospital bed to witness and sign the affidavit. We’ve banked with Capitec since 2012. This runaround is unacceptable and is now delaying our only source of income.

3 replies

Review Distribution

5 Star

0 (0%)

4 Star

0 (0%)

3 Star

0 (0%)

2 Star

0 (0%)

1 Star

3 (100%)

About

About Us
How Hellopeter Works
Press

Community

Help Centre for Reviewers
Sign In
Blog

Businesses

Hellopeter Business
Plans & Pricing
Business Sign In
Help Centre for Businesses

Follow Us

About

About Us
How Hellopeter Works
Press

Community

Help Centre
Sign In
Blog

Businesses

Hellopeter Business
Plans & Pricing
Business Sign In
Help Centre

Follow Us

© Copyright 2026 hellopeter.com and its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Terms & Conditions|Privacy Policy