RD
Raymondt D
Active since Jun 2019
55
Reviews
0
Industries
Reviews
55 reviews3 months ago
TIME TO CLOSE ONLINE CAR PARTS
Having taken the times to read all the reviews it's become very apparent that a complaint should be lodged, which I intend to do with the **** Watcher and Consumer Goods & Services Ombudsman (CGSO) jointly with the South African Banking Services as this company is a sham making promises that never materialize or answered. It is critical for these steps to be taken as Online Car Parts have no moral business standing
168 replies
3 months ago
SHOPIFY INTO *****
I have noted with distress that SHOPIFY is complacent with *****ulent business activities and misrepresentation. You cannot even file a complaint unless 30 days had expired. It has also been brought to my attention that majority of complains of theft and ***** run through these channels. Thus, if you see a shopify anywhere on purchases you must take note that you stand a 99% chance of being de*****ed. They had been an active participant in ***** over tictoc.
0 replies
3 months ago
Online Purchases via TicToc Bellevion Zylavine are dangerous
On 8 January 2026, I placed an order and made payment of R1450.00 to Zylavine. On the same date, I received an order confirmation from contact@zylavine.com. On 10 January 2026, I followed up via the same email address to enquire about the status of my order. To date, I have received no response. I have since observed that Zylavine’s website, adverti*****ts, and TikTok marketing campaigns have gone silent, leaving no means to track my order or verify delivery progress. There is no contact number available, and the provided email address remains unanswered. Given the lack of communication, absence of customer support, and disappearance of marketing activity, I have strong reason to believe this may constitute a case of *****. I hereby request an immediate investigation into this matter.
0 replies
4 months ago
Pikitup
It has become increasingly evident that the refuse collection services provided by the City of Johannesburg through Pick-It-Up are repeatedly disrupted due to strikes, meetings, or other internal matters. These interruptions severely compromise the timely removal of household waste. When services are suspended, collections are often deferred to weekends, requiring overtime payments. This cycle of disruption and delayed service has become routine, with residents experiencing non-delivery every second or third week. Such inconsistency is unacceptable and reflects a disregard for the City’s obligation to provide uninterrupted essential services. The consequences extend beyond inconvenience. Uncollected refuse creates a hazardous and unhygienic environment. Residents are forced to store full bins inside their homes, exposing families to foul odors, pests, and potential health risks. The accumulation of waste undermines public sanitation standards and erodes confidence in the City’s ability to safeguard the wellbeing of its citizens. The City of Johannesburg has a constitutional and civic duty to render reliable waste management services. This responsibility is not optional, nor should it be compromised by internal disputes or administrative inefficiencies. Service delivery must prioritize public health and environmental hygiene above all else. Given the persistent failures of Pick-It-Up, serious consideration must be given to alternative solutions, including the privatization of refuse collection. If the current provider cannot fulfill its mandate, residents cannot be expected to endure ongoing neglect. Without immediate corrective action, the only recourse available to the public will be to boycott these services until the City demonstrates its commitment to restoring order and accountability.
0 replies
6 months ago
UperEats you Money
🚨 Consumer Warning: My Experience with UberEATS I recently placed an order through UberEATS during a "Buy One Get One Free" promotion. The advertised price was R156.00, but my account was debited R260.00 — a significant discrepancy. I immediately attempted to resolve the issue through their support channels, but my concerns were met with silence. UberEATS failed to acknowledge the error, and there was no accessible way to escalate the matter. This lack of accountability and transparency is deeply disappointing. In my view, this behavior borders on *********, and I feel compelled to speak out. I will no longer use their services and strongly urge others to exercise caution when dealing with UberEATS. Promotions should not be a trap — and customers deserve better. Be warned: double-check your charges and don’t expect support if something goes wrong.
71 replies
8 months ago
SUPER LIES FOR INCOMPETTENTS
The theatrics os BUFFALO and SHEIN lies and deception is never ending when it comes to deliveries. In my case I have received three messages regarding a failed delivery. They all read the same- "Delivery of your order GS******TL (tracking number BUFZA7GH***XX) has failed. The main reason is due to no one being present during the delivery or couldn't reach the recipient. Please immediately contact your local carrier to retrieve the package before it is returned to the sender. If you need additional help, we are always at your service." - There was no call and I called on BUFFALO to profe same. The so called attempt to deliver is another lie as my CCtv footage will clearly show that nothing was attempted and then lastly the controle security control will also clearly state that nothing of was "attempted" to be delivered. It's time this ****ness and lies get reported to Business forums so to ensure that their actions and lies come to a screaming halt and their enablers see their brand being tarnished. I do not expect SHIEN nor BUFFELO to respond here as they are so into there lies and decieptments they dont know any difrent.
0 replies
8 months ago
CCD Couriers failed delivery and inadequate communication
Formal complaint regarding failed delivery and inadequate communication I hereby place on record my formal complaint arising from CCD Couriers’ failure to deliver goods ordered from Rain Mobile, together with CCD’s unacceptable delays, lack of communication, and disregard for the agreed delivery window. The conduct described below caused material inconvenience, loss of time, and disrupted professional commitments. Parties • Customer: [Your full name, ID/Account/Order number] • Supplier: Rain Mobile • Courier: CCD Couriers • Background and timeline Date Time Event Details 8 August 2025 — Order placed Order placed with Rain Mobile; delivery assigned to CCD Couriers. 11 August 2025 — Delivery scheduled CCD confirmed delivery for 12 August 2025, between 10:00 and 12:00, with a requirement that I be present in person for verification. 11 August 2025 — Confirmation provided I received and promptly accepted the delivery meeting invitation by email, confirming my availability for the agreed window. 12 August 2025 10:00–12:00 Non-delivery No delivery occurred within the scheduled window. My enquiries to CCD during this time went unanswered. 12 August 2025 ±13:00 Late notice CCD called to advise they were “running late.” I informed CCD I could not wait indefinitely due to other scheduled responsibilities and meetings. 12 August 2025 ±15:00 Failed attempt CCD arrived at the premises. Security notified me; I advised I was on my way and would arrive within five minutes. Upon my arrival, I was informed the driver indicated he would deliver “around the corner” and then left. No delivery was completed, and the driver did not return. Breaches and concerns • Failure to honor agreed delivery window: CCD did not deliver within the confirmed 10:00–12:00 timeframe, despite the requirement that I be personally available, which I honored. • Inadequate and untimely communication: CCD failed to respond to enquiries during the delivery window and only contacted me approximately one hour after the window had lapsed to advise of a delay. • Unreasonable conduct at the point of delivery: Despite being informed that I would arrive within five minutes, the driver departed and did not return, resulting in a failed handover without just cause. • Disregard for customer’s time and commitments: CCD’s conduct required me to remain available beyond the agreed period and disrupted pre-existing professional obligations. • Unreliable service and misrepresentation by conduct: CCD’s assurances regarding timing and personal attendance requirements were not upheld, rendering the representations ineffective and the service unreliable. Prejudice suffered • Wasted time and opportunity cost: The missed window and extended, indeterminate wait period caused quantifiable loss of productive time. • Disruption to professional commitments: Meetings and obligations had to be deferred or adjusted to accommodate CCD’s delays. • Inconvenience and uncer*****y: The absence of clear, timely updates and the driver’s departure without delivery compounded avoidable inconvenience. Demand for remedial action 1. Immediate delivery or cancellation: Complete delivery at a fixed, binding time acceptable to me within two business days, with written confirmation, failing which cancel the order at my election and issue a full refund without delay. 2. Written explanation: Provide a written account of the failures outlined above, including why communication and delivery protocols were not followed. 3. Assurance of compliance: Confirm the concrete measures CCD will implement to ensure adherence to scheduled delivery windows and effective, proactive communication going forward. 4. Compensation: Offer reasonable compensation for the wasted time and inconvenience occasioned by the missed delivery window, inadequate communication, and failed handover. 5. Reservation of rights 6. I reserve all rights, including the right to escalate this complaint to Rain Mobile as the contracting supplier and to pursue any remedies available under applicable consumer protection laws and the contract of sale and carriage. Nothing herein constitutes a waiver of rights, and all rights are expressly reserved.
53 replies
9 months ago
Dumping Nandos Practices
On the 3rd of August 2025 and at approximately 07:44 and at 63 African View Drive, Nandos Blue Hills dump there rubish on a gravel path. This is private property and no dumping allowed. I had contacted management Mr Patrick and advise that they should collect there *******. He undertook to do so, bit never dit. I will hand over the CCtv footage to the Health Department and will follow up on an exposure to the actions of Nandos.
106 replies
11 months ago
ClearScore Failure
ClearScore cannot be reached, calling their office number ends in one hour plus waiting. ClearScore debits my account twice each month thereby doubling there agreed payment. My bank informs me to get hold of Clear Score and take the matter up with them. I can say this much, it would appear that ClearScore is nothing but a f**** with absolutely nothing to offer but ***** your information
0 replies
12 months ago
VAT AND PRICE INCREASES FAILURE
I have noted in the last two weeks several companies pushed their prices up under the pretext of the proposed VAT increase. This, however, was done on the backbone of the VAT increase, which was terminated today. I have noted that despite the VAT increase cancelation, no service provider changed their price increase. I find this opportunistic and shortfins in future business. I for one will not accept the price increases and will terminate services under these pretext of a VAT increase.
0 replies
Review Distribution
5 Star
7 (12.727272727272727%)
4 Star
2 (3.6363636363636362%)
3 Star
1 (1.8181818181818181%)
2 Star
0 (0%)
1 Star
45 (81.81818181818181%)